Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#273); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 32.2.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1065 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 62.6% | 79.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1141 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#273); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Qwen1.5-7B or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.