Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen3-1.7B
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 31.4 to 16.3.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1065 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1080 | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | — |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1141 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.