Model comparison

Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen3-1.7B

Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-7B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #273 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 31.4 to 16.3.

Side by side

Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
Qwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.426.6
Released2024-02-042025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Coding1107—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%

Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1065—

Math Qwen1.5-7B leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
LMArena Math1080—

Knowledge Qwen1.5-7B leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond—38%
LMArena Expert1055—
MMLU62.6%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1058—
LMArena Chinese1141—
LMArena Russian1006—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1058—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1090—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1083—
LMArena Creative Writing1035—
LMArena Multi-Turn1062—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper