Model comparison

Mistral Nemo vs Qwen1.5-7B

Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

25.9

Rank #332 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-7B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 28.2 to 12.3.

Side by side

Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5-7B specifications
Mistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.930.8
Released2024-07-012024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked1013

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Coding—1107

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), Qwen1.5-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.6%—
BALROG17.6%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Hard Prompts—1066
DTBench48.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.63—
PIQA83.5%—

Math Qwen1.5-7B leads

Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Math—1080
MATH Level 510.8%—
GSM8K84.2%—

Knowledge Qwen1.5-7B leads

Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
GPQA Diamond29.9%—
LMArena Expert—1055
BoolQ82.5%—
MMLU—62.6%

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Non-English—1058
LMArena Chinese—1140
LMArena Russian—1006

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Instruction Following—1058

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Longer Query—1090

Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-7B leads

Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Text—1084
LMArena Creative Writing—1035
EQ-Bench Creative Writing881—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1061

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5-7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper