Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen1.5-7B
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 28.2 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1107 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), Qwen1.5-7B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1066 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Qwen1.5-7B leads
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-7B leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1058 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-7B leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1035 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1061 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5-7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.