Model comparison
o1-pro vs Qwen3-1.7B
o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1-pro leads 29.7 to 19.6.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o1-pro | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-19 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $150 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $600 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning o1-pro leads
o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
Knowledge o1-pro leads
o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-pro better than Qwen3-1.7B?
o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.