Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen1.5-7B

GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

70.8

Rank #1 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-7B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #273 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Astra scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Astra leads 85.1 to 20.4.
  • Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index70.831.4
Released2026-09-032024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$50—
Results tracked5613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 73.7 (#2), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Coding14871107
DeepSWE74.1%—
FrontierCode53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1786—
FrontierSWE65.5%—
SciCode56.5%—
GSO79.4%—
WeirdML93.6%—
MirrorCode46.7%—
ALE-Bench2,951—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Astra: 52.9 (#3), Qwen1.5-7B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
APEX-Agents64.7%—
Remote Labor Index20.8%—
BALROG68.3%—
GDP.pdf34.2%—
Vending-Bench 215,515—

Reasoning GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 85.1 (#1), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Hard Prompts14621065
ARC-AGI-295%—
NYT Connections (extended)98.1%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles72%—
EBR-Bench76.2%—
Mystery Game Puzzles84%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA64.4%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.45—

Math GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 93.5 (#2), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Math14651080
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 497.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#1), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Expert14831055
GPQA Diamond95.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam54.8%—
SimpleQA Verified75.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.7%—
MMLU—62.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Astra: 55.0 (#3), Qwen1.5-7B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Vision1281—
Blueprint-Bench 249.7%—
Furniture Assembly80%—
LMArena Document1468—

Multilingual GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 53.7 (#61), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Non-English14301058
LMArena Chinese14841141
LMArena Russian14361006
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1440—
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1426—
LMArena Spanish1407—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 76.3 (#44), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Instruction Following14501058

Long Context GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 44.5 (#62), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Longer Query14561090

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#7), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Text14411083
LMArena Creative Writing14181035
LMArena Multi-Turn14481062
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2173—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Astra better than Qwen1.5-7B?

GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Astra or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 73.7 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Astra and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Astra has 56 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper