Model comparison
Qwen1.5 4b Chat vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5 4b Chat scores higher in 1 category and Wizardlm 13b in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.5 to 23.8.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 13b leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 999 | 1035 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 976 | 1018 |
Math Too close to call
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1026 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 980 | — |
Multilingual Wizardlm 13b leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 979 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1024 | 1023 |
| LMArena German | 902 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 952 | — |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 13b leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1048 |
Long Context Wizardlm 13b leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 988 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 13b leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 997 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 969 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 977 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5 4b Chat better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5 4b Chat or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5 4b Chat and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.