Model comparison
Llama 3-70B vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.2 to 12.8.
Side by side
| Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-04-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 31 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3-70B leads
Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | 1018 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1218 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | — |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |
Multilingual Llama 3-70B leads
Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1232 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads
Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | 1048 |
Long Context Llama 3-70B leads
Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3-70B leads
Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3-70B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3-70B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.