Model comparison
Qwen1.5 4b Chat vs Qwen1.5-7B
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5 4b Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 29.6 to 23.8.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 999 | 1107 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 976 | 1065 |
Math Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1026 | 1080 |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 980 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 979 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1024 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 952 | 1006 |
| LMArena German | 902 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1058 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 988 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 997 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 969 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 977 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5 4b Chat better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5 4b Chat or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5 4b Chat and Qwen1.5-7B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.