Model comparison
Qwen1.5-14B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
UpstageSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.7 to 33.7.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-14B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259), Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217), Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1398 |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214), Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1125 | 1418 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230), Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | 1421 |
| MMLU | 68.6% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257), Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1115 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1043 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266), Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | 1376 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252), Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270), Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | 1391 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-14B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Solar Pro4 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.