Model comparison

Command R+ vs Solar Pro4

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 9.2.
  • Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+ and Solar Pro4 specifications
Command R+Solar Pro4
ProviderCohereUpstage
Noometry Index32.442.1
Released2024-08-302026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K524K
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$10$1.20
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Solar Pro4 leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Solar Pro4
LMArena Coding11871437
LMArena WebDev—1371
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Solar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts11861399
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Solar Pro4 leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Solar Pro4
LMArena Math11881416
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Solar Pro4
LMArena Expert11741427
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Solar Pro4
LMArena Non-English12161361
LMArena Chinese12261415
LMArena French12091397
LMArena German12161364
LMArena Japanese11661309
LMArena Korean11381382
LMArena Russian12271360
LMArena Spanish11891401

Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Solar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following11971377
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Solar Pro4 leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Solar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query12301381

Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Solar Pro4
LMArena Text12291386
LMArena Creative Writing12351316
LMArena Multi-Turn12131385
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper