Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen1.5-14B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 56.6 to 33.6.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 32.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | 1138 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1113 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1125 |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1102 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen1.5-14B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.