Model comparison
Qwen1.5-14B vs Qwen3-4B
Qwen1.5-14B and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 29.3.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1125 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | — |
| MMLU | 68.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | — |
| LMArena French | 1115 | — |
| LMArena German | 1043 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Qwen3-4B?
Qwen1.5-14B and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.