Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3-4B
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
Math Qwen3-4B leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3-4B?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.