Model comparison

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3-4B

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 19.2.

Side by side

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-4B specifications
Olmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.231.5
Released—2025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked166

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Coding1210—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1208—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%
Omni-MATH16.1%—
LMArena Math1208—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond—52.3%
MMLU-Pro41.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
GPQA (HELM)28.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1160—
LMArena Chinese1192—
LMArena Russian1187—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
IFEval78%—
LMArena Instruction Following1186—

Long Context Not comparable

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1194—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1218—
LMArena Creative Writing1199—
WildBench73.4%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1221—

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3-4B?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper