Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen3-1.7B

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 33.7 to 16.3.

Side by side

Qwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.226.6
Released2024-04-252025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked204

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
BigCodeBench Instruct35%—
LMArena Coding1184—
BigCodeBench Complete44.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%

Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads

Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1168—
ForecastBench57.7—

Math Qwen1.5-110B leads

Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
LMArena Math1185—

Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads

Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond—38%
LMArena Expert1144—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1206—
LMArena French1151—
LMArena German1123—
LMArena Japanese1074—
LMArena Korean1044—
LMArena Russian1118—
LMArena Spanish1142—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1158—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1157—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1175—
LMArena Creative Writing1148—
LMArena Multi-Turn1160—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper