Model comparison

Mistral Nemo vs Qwen1.5-110B

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

25.9

Rank #332 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 30.7 to 12.3.

Side by side

Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5-110B specifications
Mistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.933.6
Released2024-07-012024-04-25
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked1020

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
LMArena Coding—1184
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), Qwen1.5-110B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.6%—
BALROG17.6%—

Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads

Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts—1168
DTBench48.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.63—
ForecastBench—57.7
PIQA83.5%—

Math Qwen1.5-110B leads

Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math—1185
MATH Level 510.8%—
GSM8K84.2%—

Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads

Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
GPQA Diamond29.9%—
LMArena Expert—1144
BoolQ82.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English—1142
LMArena Chinese—1206
LMArena French—1150
LMArena German—1123
LMArena Japanese—1074
LMArena Korean—1044
LMArena Russian—1118
LMArena Spanish—1141

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following—1158

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query—1157

Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads

Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text—1175
LMArena Creative Writing—1148
EQ-Bench Creative Writing881—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1160

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5-110B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper