Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 30.7 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 33.6 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1150 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1141 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5-110B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.