Model comparison
Qwen3-1.7B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.6 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-04-29 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3-1.7B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-1.7B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.