Model comparison

Qwen Plus vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

36.7

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen Plus leads 22.0 to 13.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 65.3% for Qwen Plus and 42.7% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen Plus and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Qwen PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index36.732.6
Released2024-01-252024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2014

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding13281236

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts13171220
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.3%—
DTBench81.1%—
LMCA24%—

Math Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202517.8%4.4%
LMArena Math13261242
MATH Level 565.3%42.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond48.1%46.3%
LMArena Expert1328—

Multilingual Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English13101236
LMArena Chinese13471249
LMArena Russian13231246
LMArena Japanese1251—

Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following13031233

Long Context Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query13251224

Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text13261256
LMArena Creative Writing12931231
LMArena Multi-Turn13361252

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Plus better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen Plus or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper