Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 22.4.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.