Model comparison
Granite 4.1 8b vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 7 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 36.4 to 14.2.
Side by side
| Granite 4.1 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | 1235 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | 1220 |
Math Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1246 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | 1233 |
Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.1 8b or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.