Model comparison

Qwen Max vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.4

Rank #226 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 7 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen Max leads 21.0 to 13.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 67.2% for Qwen Max and 42.7% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen Max and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Qwen MaxTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index34.432.6
Released2024-04-032024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window33K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.60—
Output $ / M tokens$6.40—
Results tracked2314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding12881236
Aider Polyglot21.8%—

Reasoning Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts12701220

Math Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.1%4.4%
LMArena Math12751242
MATH Level 567.2%42.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond56.1%46.3%
LMArena Expert1248—

Multilingual Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English12631236
LMArena Chinese12541249
LMArena Russian12741246
LMArena French1329—
LMArena German1254—
LMArena Japanese1205—
LMArena Korean1141—
LMArena Spanish1290—

Instruction Following Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following12621233

Long Context Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query12891224
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text12821256
LMArena Creative Writing12481231
LMArena Multi-Turn12771252

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Max better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen Max or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper