Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen Max
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 30.7.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1269 |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1288 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen Max?
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen Max better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.