Model comparison
Qwen-14B vs Qwen3-4B
Qwen-14B and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2023-09-24 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1072 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.8 | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |
Math Too close to call
Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1068 | — |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1029 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen3-4B?
Qwen-14B and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.