Model comparison

Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen-14B

Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Lite Amazon

31.9

Rank #265 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen-14B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Lite leads 42.1 to 27.6.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen-14B specifications
Amazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.931.4
Released2024-12-032023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K—
Max output10K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.06—
Output $ / M tokens$0.24—
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Coding12391071
LiveBench Coding27.5%—
ALE-Bench236.25—

Reasoning Too close to call

Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts12201027
LiveBench Reasoning36.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis37.2%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.03
LAMBADA—71.1%
LiveBench36.4%—
PIQA—79.9%

Math Qwen-14B leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Math12271068
Omni-MATH23.3%—
LiveBench Math36.7%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Qwen-14B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
MMLU77%66.3%
Humanity's Last Exam3.6%—
MMLU-Pro60%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%—
GPQA (HELM)39.7%—
LMArena Expert1201—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Qwen-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Vision990—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English12081041
LMArena Chinese12251077
LMArena French1237—
LMArena German1229—
LMArena Japanese1153—
LMArena Korean1153—
LMArena Russian1216—
LMArena Spanish1226—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following12051031
LiveBench Instruction Following54.1%—
IFEval77.6%—

Long Context Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query12341028

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Text12291051
LMArena Creative Writing11971028
LMArena Multi-Turn11991022
WildBench75%—
LiveBench Language25.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen-14B?

Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper