Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen-14B
Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.5 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 27.8.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 105K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1072 |
Reasoning Qwen-14B leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336), Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1029 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140), Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen-14B?
Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.5 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.