Model comparison
Pixtral Large vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 32.9.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-11-01 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 524K |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
Math Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1089 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 988 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Pixtral Large better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large or Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Pixtral Large and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Pixtral Large has 3 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.