Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
UpstageSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.7 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1439 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1398 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1418 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1421 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1376 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1391 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Solar Pro4 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.