Model comparison
Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 25.3.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.075 / $0.30 for Phi-4 Mini.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-11 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.075 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Mini or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Phi-4 Mini lists at $0.075 and $0.30.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.