Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Pro Amazon

31.0

Rank #281 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 27.4.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.

Side by side

Amazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.039.9
Released2024-12-032026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window300K1M
Max output10K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.80$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$3.20$0.13
Results tracked387

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Coding38.1%—
LMArena Coding1270—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25%—
TheAgentCompany1.7%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index123.8144.64
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LiveBench Reasoning32.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1246—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
LiveBench Data Analysis48.3%—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
Omni-MATH24.2%—
LiveBench Math38%—
LMArena Math1252—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
Humanity's Last Exam4.4%—
MMLU-Pro67.3%—
Confabulations30.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
GPQA (HELM)44.6%—
LMArena Expert1211—
MMLU82%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision980—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1234—
LMArena Chinese1244—
LMArena French1271—
LMArena German1243—
LMArena Japanese1200—
LMArena Korean1203—
LMArena Russian1240—
LMArena Spanish1182—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following67.1%—
IFEval81.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1235—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1255—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1259—
LMArena Creative Writing1212—
Short-Story Creative Writing60.5%—
WildBench77.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1246—
LiveBench Language37%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper