Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.5

Rank #277 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.5

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 25.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 22.5% for Gemma 3 27B and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.08 / $0.16 for Gemma 3 27B.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
  • Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Gemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.539.5
Released2025-03-112026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K1M
Max output8K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.08$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$0.16$0.13
Results tracked437

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—
LMArena Coding1322—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
Chess Puzzles0%23%
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04144.62
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1340—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
LiveBench50%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
LiveBench Math55.4%—
LMArena Math1312—
MATH Level 574%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond47.7%82.3%
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1303—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1165—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1334—
LMArena Chinese1347—
LMArena French1368—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Russian1349—
LMArena Spanish1348—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1321—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1333—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1358—
LMArena Creative Writing1346—
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LMArena Multi-Turn1344—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Gemma 3 27B lists at $0.08 and $0.16.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper