Model comparison

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Wizardlm 70b leads 20.7 to 14.8.

Side by side

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Phi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
ProviderMicrosoftMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.333.0
Released2024-04-23—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding11011081
LiveBench Coding20.3%—

Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts11001079
LiveBench Reasoning15.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis30.3%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.1%—
HellaSwag77%—
LiveBench24%—
WinoGrande81.5%—

Math Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math11511116
LiveBench Math17.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1067—
ARC (AI2) Challenge90.7%—
MMLU75.7%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA58.1%—

Multilingual Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English10581078
LMArena Chinese10611052
LMArena German10801083
LMArena Russian11111155
LMArena French1135—
LMArena Japanese966—
LMArena Korean894—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following10871093
LiveBench Instruction Following47.2%—

Long Context Too close to call

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query10881097

Writing & Preference Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text11101120
LMArena Creative Writing10831149
LMArena Multi-Turn10681108
LiveBench Language12.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper