Model comparison

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both.

Side by side

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
Phi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.3—
Released2024-04-232024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked326

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LiveBench Coding20.3%—
LMArena Coding1101—

Reasoning Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
HellaSwag77%76.8%
WinoGrande81.5%72.9%
LiveBench Reasoning15.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1100—
LiveBench Data Analysis30.3%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.14
LiveBench24%—

Math Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LiveBench Math17.6%—
LMArena Math1151—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ARC (AI2) Challenge90.7%60.9%
MMLU75.7%68%
LMArena Expert1067—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA58.1%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1058—
LMArena Chinese1061—
LMArena French1135—
LMArena German1080—
LMArena Japanese966—
LMArena Korean894—
LMArena Russian1111—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LiveBench Instruction Following47.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1087—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Longer Query1088—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1110—
LMArena Creative Writing1083—
LMArena Multi-Turn1068—
LiveBench Language12.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper