Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Claude 3.5 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#315); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) Alibaba (Qwen)

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.2—
Released2024-10-222024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked496

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1286—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15113.14
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
HellaSwag—76.8%
LiveBench43.5%—
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
MMLU74.3%68%
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Claude 3.5 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#315); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper