Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | — |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.