Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 58.8 to 27.1.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Phi 3 Mini 128k InstructStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderMicrosoftStepFun
Noometry Index29.742.3
Released2024-04-232026-01-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding10391436
BigCodeBench Instruct29.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10281411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math10891408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert9841421

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English10001385
LMArena Chinese10161447
LMArena French10391421
LMArena German10061405
LMArena Japanese8991354
LMArena Korean8561352
LMArena Russian10041385
LMArena Spanish10591419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10231385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query9961402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text10501403
LMArena Creative Writing10241357
LMArena Multi-Turn9891405

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper