Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 27.1.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Hunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.529.7
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13901039
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13991028

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math14141089

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1395984

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13951000
LMArena Chinese14251016
LMArena Korean1406856
LMArena Russian13851004
LMArena French—1039
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13741023

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1384996

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14011050
LMArena Creative Writing13921024
LMArena Multi-Turn1393989

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper