Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 26.8.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 42.2 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.60 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 27B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 27B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |
Math Qwen3.6 27B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1089 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 984 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | — |
| LMArena French | 1039 | — |
| LMArena German | 1006 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 27B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?
Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen3.6 27B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.