Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 27.1.
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | 1399 |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1089 | 1416 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 984 | 1427 |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1039 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1006 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.