Model comparison
phi-3-medium 14B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Solar Pro4 leads 39.8 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| phi-3-medium 14B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.23 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is phi-3-medium 14B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.