Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Solar Pro4 leads 39.0 to 18.0.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309), Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1439 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312), Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1398 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270), Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1418 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278), Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1421 |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243), Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1376 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226), Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1313 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1391 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.