Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 46.0 to 26.8.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Phi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.742.9
Released2024-04-232026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked1915

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
BigCodeBench Instruct29.6%—
LMArena Coding1039—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1028—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.78

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1089—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
LMArena Expert984—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1000—
LMArena Chinese1016—
LMArena French1039—
LMArena German1006—
LMArena Japanese899—
LMArena Korean856—
LMArena Russian1004—
LMArena Spanish1059—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1023—

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query996—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1050—
LMArena Creative Writing1024—
LMArena Multi-Turn989—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper