Model comparison
phi-3-medium 14B vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. phi-3-medium 14B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 46.0 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B and 84.8% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.23 | 146.78 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.