Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 46.0 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.