Model comparison

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen3 8B

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.0 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Qwen3 8B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.7

Rank #238 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 8B leads 36.1 to 30.2.

Side by side

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3 8B specifications
Phi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.033.7
Released—2025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.18
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked1711

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 8B leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
SciCode—22.6%
LMArena Coding1130—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—42.6%

Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—5%
LMArena Hard Prompts1127—
DTBench—59.7%
LMCA—8.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—136.17

Math Qwen3 8B leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—56.1%
LMArena Math1173—

Knowledge Qwen3 8B leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
GPQA Diamond—56.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.8%
LMArena Expert1108—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Qwen3 8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
LMArena Non-English1094—
LMArena Chinese1108—
LMArena French1110—
LMArena German1101—
LMArena Japanese1042—
LMArena Korean954—
LMArena Russian1145—
LMArena Spanish1095—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Qwen3 8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
LMArena Instruction Following1113—

Long Context Qwen3 8B leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.1%
LMArena Longer Query1120—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Qwen3 8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 8B
LMArena Text1138—
LMArena Creative Writing1107—
LMArena Multi-Turn1088—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen3 8B?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.0 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Qwen3 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper