Model comparison

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen3.5-9B

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.0 vs 33.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-9B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #236 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 30.2.

Side by side

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B specifications
Phi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.033.8
Released—2026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked1710

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
SciCode—27.5%
LMArena Coding1130—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
Terminal-Bench—9.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—12%
LMArena Hard Prompts1127—
DTBench—71.2%
LMCA—24.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.46

Math Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—48.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—61.7%
LMArena Math1173—

Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
GPQA Diamond—79%
LMArena Expert1108—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Non-English1094—
LMArena Chinese1108—
LMArena French1110—
LMArena German1101—
LMArena Japanese1042—
LMArena Korean954—
LMArena Russian1145—
LMArena Spanish1095—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Instruction Following1113—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Longer Query1120—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Text1138—
LMArena Creative Writing1107—
LMArena Multi-Turn1088—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.0 vs 33.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Qwen3.5-9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper