Model comparison
phi-3-medium 14B vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 3 leads 36.8 to 9.1.
Side by side
| phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 40.5 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 3: 28.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.23 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Step 3 leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Step 3 leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |
Multilingual Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 3: 46.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 3: 70.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |
Long Context Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 3: 40.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 3: 54.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is phi-3-medium 14B or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Step 3 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.