Model comparison
MiniMax M1 vs phi-3-medium 14B
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax M1 leads 36.4 to 9.1.
Side by side
| MiniMax M1 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-06-13 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.55 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1361 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena French | 1370 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax M1 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax M1 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.