Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 3 leads 36.2 to 18.0.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Step 3 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
Knowledge Step 3 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Step 3: 46.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following Step 3 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Step 3: 40.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1322 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1340 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Step 3 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.