Model comparison
Phi-1.5 vs Qwen1.5-7B
Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#273); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 31.4 |
| Released | 2023-09-11 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1107 |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1065 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 91.53 | — |
| HellaSwag | 47.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73.4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 37.6% | 62.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 44.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 37.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1058 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-1.5 better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#273); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and Qwen1.5-7B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.