Model comparison
Command R vs Phi-1.5
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#272); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Command R | Phi-1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | — |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-09-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 91.53 |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 37.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Phi-1.5?
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#272); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Phi-1.5 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.