Model comparison
Qwen1.5-32B vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-32B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 35.2 to 13.5.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | 1316 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | — |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1130 | 1299 |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1304 |
Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | 1279 |
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | — |
| MMLU | 74.4% | — |
Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1177 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | 1324 |
| LMArena French | 1101 | — |
| LMArena German | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1008 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | — |
Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1287 |
Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-32B or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.